David Cameron is obviously not a reader of Rumpole of the
Bailey. One of Horace’s most important rules was never to ask a question to
which you didn’t already know the answer. With his speech on the EU today, not
only does the Prime Minister not know the answer, he’s not even sure of the
question.
Politically, it’s a reasonable move in the short
term. As Mr Cameron side-stepped his way to his seat in the House of Commons
for the weekly farce of Prime Ministers’ Questions, he received the largest
cheer from Conservative backbenchers he has perhaps ever received. Since the days of John Major’s
‘bastards’, the Tory anti-EU contingent has become the majority view amongst
Tory MPs and finally, they’ve got their way and now have got five years to
campaign for a no vote.
The prime minister has also rather shot UKIP’s fox. Nigel
Farage – the only vaguely palatable member of the party – has always tried to
claim UKIP is not a one issue pressure group, but he’s kidding himself. No one
ever decided to support UKIP for their green agenda, jobs policy or social
mores. Now, while they’re partly responsible for Cameron’s volte-face on
Europe, they will struggle to be heard. They were never going to win a seat at
the next election anyway.
Labour is left looking very vulnerable on Europe as Ed
Miliband has failed to find a vaguely coherent policy. There were hints that
the opposition might steal a march on the Tories with an offer of an in/out
referendum; Miliband has said today he opposes one while much of his parliamentary
party disagrees. After a decent 2012, Ed Miliband’s leadership is looking shaky
once again.
That’s the good news for David Cameron. But already the
dangers of his position are becoming exposed. The prime minister has no control
on where this might go. He's trying to juggle without knowing how many balls he has in the air.
Skating over the fact that the whole referendum issue
depends on whether the Tories can win an outright majority at the 2015 election
– an almighty challenge considering the economy and the electoral hurdles in
the way – the prime minister is very vulnerable.
Negotiations over what powers can be reclaimed by Brussels
will have to begin immediately and it’s far from clear that other EU states are
vaguely interested in such a conversation. Carl Bildt, the Swedish foreign
minister, was withering in his response: ‘Flexibility sounds fine, but if you
open up to a 28-speed Europe, at the end of the day there is no Europe at all.
Just a mess.’ The French and Germans have been similarly dismissive.
To a certain extent these comments can be swatted away; more
of a concern would be the reaction of businessmen such as Martin Sorrell, whose
WPP made a much-fanfared return to these shores after the last election. He
said:
‘Having a referendum creates more uncertainty and we don't need
that. This is a political decision. This is not an economic decision. This
isn't good news. You added another reason why people will postpone investment
decisions.’
Mr Cameron is committed
to campaigning to stay in the EU despite not knowing for what he’ll be campaigning.
Meanwhile, the majority of his party will be campaigning to leave Europe, hardly
an ideal situation for the leader of a political party. And it is pretty
impossible to imagine him fighting for a yes vote alongside Ken Clarke, Michael
Heseltine, Tony Blair and Ed Miliband etc.
The future of the EU is
of course a vital topic but it doesn’t excite; the economy, the NHS, jobs,
education, energy prices, food prices, the general cost of living, these are
the biggest issues facing people. Already today the IMF has cut its growth
forecast to a paltry 1 per cent year and slashed it for 2014 too; Osborne
remains clueless as to how to get things going again.
Once, Mr Cameron
criticised his own party for ‘banging on about Europe’, with this speech the
same looks set to occur for another five years despite poll after poll shows it
comes very low down on voters’ list of priorities. Any level of political navel
gazing on Europe is depressing; five years’ worth is almost enough to drive one
to Dignitas.
It’s a shame John
Mortimer is no longer with us. His later Rumpole tales featured thinly veiled attacks
on Labour’s human rights; I can only imagine what fun he’d have with this lot.



1 comment:
I agree that one of the results of the speech and the policies announced in it should be to drain UKIP of the support of anyone who wants a debate and referendum on EU membership who isn't a "fruitcake, nutter or closet racist". Miliband helped here by making it clear that a vote for UKIP will be a vote against getting a referendum because Labour aren't offering one and voting UKIP can only have the effect of increasing the chances of a Labour government.
Post a Comment